ED and Supreme Court.
During Thursday’s hearing, the Supreme Court had a big thing to say about the Enforcement Directorate and its director. The Supreme Court said the education ministry and its director can issue instructions on the facts of money laundering cases, but they cannot tell prosecutors how to behave in court.
On the one hand, this judgment of the Supreme Court limits the influence of investigative agencies in the judicial process; on the other hand, it fully demonstrates the independence of prosecutors.
A bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Augustine George Masih made the comments to the ED and ED officials while passing an order granting bail to Zeeshan Haider and Dawood Nasir. Zeeshan Haider and Dawood Nasir were arrested in Delhi Waqf Board money laundering case.The bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Augustine George Masih noted that he had spent a long time in jail.
read this too
Supreme Court says this about prosecutors
The Supreme Court bench considered the directions of the trial court. At the same time, the court also expressed its opinion on the limitations of the Ministry of Education’s powers over prosecutors, saying that the head of the anti-money laundering investigation agency should issue instructions to prosecutors and that they should not object if a case is postponed due to the agency. Bail application.
During the hearing, the judge said the Enforcement Directorate and its director could give instructions to prosecutors but what they should do in court. The Enforcement Directorate or its Director cannot issue any instructions to prosecutors in this regard.
While granting bail to another accused Kausal Imam Siddiqui, the trial court had criticized the ED for delaying the trial in the same case.
Supreme Court issued these directions to ED
Justice Oka called the trial court’s earlier directive to the director of education “harsh” but agreed that prosecutors should work in a transparent and impartial manner.
The judge said it was absolutely clear prosecutors should be fair and transparent. If the case arises based on a binding precedent, then it is his duty to notify the court.
