New Delhi: While the polling date for the Maharashtra assembly elections is approaching, at the same time, the Supreme Court today held a hearing on the dispute over the party symbol of the state’s largest political party NCP. During the hearing, the Supreme Court directed Ajit Pawar’s faction to use Sharad Pawar’s pictures and videos in election campaigns. Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan told Ajit Pawar’s lawyer that you should not use Sharad Pawar video and create its own independent political identity, now the Supreme Court will hear the matter again next Tuesday.
Why is Sharad Pawar’s name being used again and again?
During today’s hearing, Justice Surya Kant asked the Ajit Pawar faction why Sharad Pawar’s name is being used again and again despite the old video? In response, Ajit Pawar’s lawyer said that this is an old Facebook page. How can I check this? In this regard, the Supreme Court said that it should ensure that both old and new videos comply with the regulations. Now you are trying to establish yourself as a separate party because of your ideological differences with Sharad Pawar.
Do not use Sharad Pawar’s videos
The Supreme Court said we will try to convince both parties that you should focus on conducting elections. The people of this country are very smart and know how to vote. People of the country can recognize who is Sharad Pawar and who is Ajit Pawar. You should obey the court order honestly and respect it. We don’t know if the video had an impact, and if so, how big an impact it had? The court asked Ajit Pawar’s lawyers to create their own political identity and not use Sharad Pawar’s videos.
We follow court orders: Ajit Pai
In fact, the Supreme Court is hearing a petition from Sharad Pawar’s faction in which they are trying to stop their nephew (Ajit Pawar) from using the clock symbol to represent their party in this election. After Sharad Pawar group filed a complaint, Supreme Court asked Ajit Pawar group’s lawyers if they followed the Supreme Court’s instructions? Ajit Pawar Group’s lawyer said we have followed the court order. Advertisements with disclaimers were also placed in newspapers. Ajit Pawar’s lawyer told the court that Sharad Pawar’s organization was trying to mislead voters by claiming that the order was not followed.
This is an attempt to show that the family is one and should get votes for one name: Singhvi
Sharad Pawar’s lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi claimed that the Ajit faction wanted to postpone the matter to November 20 (polling day). To this, Justice Surya Kant asked, do you think the voters of Maharashtra are unaware of the differences between political parties? Sharad Pawar group lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi said if we look at the matter differently, the idea is that the Pawar family is one and should seek votes under the same name. You can’t do that. The Supreme Court asked how many seats are you contesting face to face? In this regard, Abhishek Manu Singhvi said that the two parties face each other on 36 seats, which is the most important thing? To Abhishek Manu Singhvi’s reply, the Supreme Court asked how voters would be confused when they come face to face. ? Lawyers for Sharad Pawar Group said that in the disclaimer provided, the two were indirectly described as one.
india latest news
