The ongoing public outcry over the National Testing Agency’s (NTA) mismanagement of NEET-UG, NEET-PG and UGC-NET examinations highlights a related concern: of meeting the career aspirations of tens of millions of young people seeking quality higher education. With half the population of the country—or around 700 million Indians—below the age of 28, our youthful demographic profile is demanding its dividend.
Just as in creating jobs, we need dramatically different thinking in higher education. The current model—where millions of candidates compete for a few thousand seats—has run its course. Yet, political compulsions and policy realism have led to just incremental adjustments.
To be fair, increasing the number of seats by 10% every year, as India has done for medical education since 2019, would be an admirable feat in any country. But India is not any country. We need to scale up at a different level to satisfy swelling aspirations.
While an expert committee investigates the NTA’s lapses in conducting examinations, the locus of policy change should be the supply of higher education. Not only have we created an academic elite—IITs, NITs, IIMs, AIIMSs and established medical colleges in states—we risk replicating this across the university system.
In the first place, the thrust of education policy ought to be on strengthening university systems in the states, where most of India’s young people study. The real scandal is not how national entrance examinations were compromised, but how our universities have atrophied. And how governments and citizens seem to have given up on them.
If public investment and policy attention is focused on the hundreds of universities across the country, on helping them upgrade their capabilities and break the bad habits they have fallen into, the pressure on students of getting into a few elite institutions will abate. Similarly, vocational education is a big part of the answer.
To get it going requires a lot more than setting up good training institutes. We must change social norms and status-signalling to indicate that a vocational diploma is a prestigious and remunerative qualification.
Second, the supply of professional education cannot keep up with demand unless there is a much greater role for private and for-profit institutions. In states that have liberalized engineering education, for instance, there is no shortage of seats and it is possible to get into a good college without going through a traumatic entrance exam preparation process.
Business and management education too has grown through private participation. Medical education can be expanded likewise. However, as my colleague Pranay Kotasthane has pointed out, many of the regulations for setting up medical colleges are unreasonable and disincentivise scale. Moreover, despite having the largest number of medical colleges in the world, India is not producing enough doctors.
Third, as Ajay Shah and I argued in an op-ed in Business Standard last year: “We think that replacing the JEE with a lottery-based allocation to IITs will have transformative effects for Indian education. It is already a lottery today, but one where the ticket so expensive that only well-off families can afford it.
A typical fee for a year’s JEE coaching is close to what an average Indian earns in a year. The JEE is a poor estimator of true capability, and it is hard to say the 80,000 who do not make it are systematically inferior to the 20,000 who do. Many chance factors are tipping the scales today, such as a student being unwell on the exam day, or a heat wave at the test centre.”
“There is a better way to allocate public resources. The price of an IIT lottery ticket can be reduced to zero. Seats can be randomly allocated to applicants who meet basic requirements. Specifically, we could envision a first-level exam, which is not about the things that Google knows. Out of that the top 200,000 ranks are shortlisted. At the second stage, a random list of 20,000 would be chosen to attend the IITs.
A basic screening exam followed by a random allocation, respecting reservation quotas, would be a fairer and more humane way to allocate places in elite engineering and medical colleges. A lottery will make the luck dimension explicit. Such a system is more in the public interest than the current one.
Instead of spending lakhs of rupees on tutorials, parents and schools will focus on learning and understanding the high school syllabus. Universities and colleges across the country will get better, with more demanding students and parents. The IITs and AIIMSes will get a more diverse cohort. We think this is a far more equitable method.”
Sure, these proposals might sound heretical. The onus, however, is on those who defend more-of-the-same incrementalism to prove that current solutions scale as fast as the challenge. Getting the NTA to conduct exams well merely solves the entrance problem. It does not create more opportunities.