‘Not everyone can set their hands on a bulldozer…’, CM Yogi’s retort to Akhilesh’s taunt on Gorakhpur

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has hit back at Akhilesh Yadav’s jibe about the bulldozer. CM Yogi said that not every person can set his hand on the bulldozer. He said that people who bow down to the rioters cannot do this, they know this.

Akhilesh Yadav had said that after the formation of the SP government in 2027, all the bulldozers of the state will be directed towards Gorakhpur. This reaction of the SP chief has come after the Supreme Court’s comment on the bulldozer action.

The Chief Minister further said that those who used to loot before 2017 are now trying to become Tipu Sultan. There was a serial called Mungeri Lal Ke Sapne. When they got the opportunity, they played with the future of the youth.

CM Yogi said that today youth from any district have got equal opportunity. The property of those who are dishonest will be confiscated. These people pushed the state into riots and made castes fight. He said that the commission has made selections for the posts of 13 departments through a transparent process. There is no discrimination on the basis of caste or district. Everyone has got an opportunity. Transparency has come in appointments in seven and a half years. This was not possible earlier, we have corrected it.

‘If SP government is formed in 2027, the bulldozer will head towards Gorakhpur’, Akhilesh attacks CM Yogi

Akhilesh Yadav was reviewing the work of the party’s Gorakhpur organization in the SP office. During this, he made a statement regarding the bulldozer action that after the formation of the SP government in 2027, all the bulldozers of the state will be directed towards Gorakhpur. This reaction of the SP chief has come after the Supreme Court’s comment on the bulldozer action. Along with this, the SP chief said that innocent people are being implicated by the government.

The Supreme Court had raised serious questions on the bulldozer action and said that it is not right to demolish someone’s house just on the basis of being accused. The court raised questions on the action of the government and administration and said that even if a person is guilty, his house cannot be demolished.